Football legal
  • Authors
  • About
  • Subscription
  • Contact
  • Login
  • Linkedin
    Twitter
Football-legal
30
May
2025
content image
Jan KLEINER
CAS
Cases
International
Football Legal # 22

SFT 4A_396/2024, 18 November 2024 - By Jan KLEINER


Previous
Next
SFT 4A_396/2024, 18 November 2024
Date of the decision: 2024-11-18

[1]

The Case in a Nutshell

The decision 4A_396/2024 of 18 November 2024 of the Swiss Federal Tribunal (SFT) concerns an appeal in civil law matters against an arbitral award issued by the Basketball Arbitral Tribunal (BAT). In the challenged award, a claim was dismissed based on the principle of Verwirkung (forfeiture), as established in the case-law of the BAT. According to this principle, claims are not heard if they are filed only after a substantial period of time. The appellant challenged the application of this principle as a violation of the principle of pacta sunt servanda. In a second plea, the appellant argued that the application of this principle was also surprising to him, constituting a violation of the appellant’s right to be heard. Both pleas were rejected and the appeal was thus unsuccessful.

The Facts

On 1 December 2017, the Basketball Federation B. engaged the professional coach A. as national basketball...

Why not join us?

Football Legal is an independent media publishing football law contents on a daily basis dedicated to all football law practitioners (lawyers, clubs, federations, intermediaries, football stakeholders, etc.).

Register today and stay tuned to the latest legal news.

Get started
Topics
  • CAS
Keywords
  • Court of Arbitration for Sport (CAS)
  • Public policy
  • Pacta sunt servanda
  • Swiss Federal Tribunal (SFT)
  • Right to be heard
  • Time limit
Authored by
Jan KLEINER
About Jan KLEINER
Contact us | Terms & Conditions | Privacy Policy | Cookies policy
© football-legal.com 2025 - All rights reserved