Football legal
  • Authors
  • About
  • Subscription
  • Contact
  • Login
  • Linkedin
    Twitter
Football-legal
09
Sep
2019
content image
Football Legal
CAS
Cases
International

CAS 2018/A/6017 FC Lugano SA v. FC Internazionale Milano S.p.A


Date of the decision: 2019-09-09
Arbitrator(s): Ulrich Haas

1. Intervention according to Article R41.3 of the CAS Code only provides participation as a formal party and not participation as a non-party (with restricted rights) in analogy to the provisions of the Swiss Code of Civil Procedure. Article R41.3 of the CAS Code is not designed to cure a failed deadline of a party that was entitled to appeal against the decision. Intervention according to Article R41.3 of the CAS Code requires a legal interest of the intervenor. By failing to meet the deadline of appeal, the party accepts the binding effects of the decision and, thus, looses any legal interest in participating in the proceeding as a party challenging said...

Why not join us?

Football Legal is an independent media publishing football law contents on a daily basis dedicated to all football law practitioners (lawyers, clubs, federations, intermediaries, football stakeholders, etc.).

Register today and stay tuned to the latest legal news.

Get started
Topics
  • CAS
  • Labour disputes
  • Player/Coach Contract
Keywords
  • Breach of contract
  • Court of Arbitration for Sport (CAS)
  • Just cause
  • Player contract
  • FIFA RSTP
Find out more
  • A Football Rarity – An Article 15 RSTP (sporting just cause) Case at the CAS!
Contact us | Terms & Conditions | Privacy Policy | Cookies policy
© football-legal.com 2025 - All rights reserved